When conducting hypothesis testing, one of the most critical — yet often misunderstood — decisions you’ll make is choosing the test size, also known as the significance level (alpha). This single value determines how cautious or aggressive your test is, and directly affects the chances of committing Type I and Type II errors.

---

Type I vs. Type II Errors — A Quick Refresher

• Type I Error (False Positive):
  You wrongly reject a true null hypothesis.
  Example: Declaring a drug effective when it isn’t.
  
• Type II Error (False Negative):
  You fail to reject a false null hypothesis.
  Example: Missing the effectiveness of a real treatment.
  

The test size (alpha) represents the probability of a Type I error. The most common value is 0.05 (5%), meaning you’re willing to accept a 1 in 20 chance of being wrong when rejecting the null.

Meanwhile, the probability of a Type II error is called beta (β), and it’s not directly controlled by alpha, but they’re inversely related. The stricter you are about avoiding a Type I error, the more likely you are to commit a Type II error — unless your sample size is large enough.

---

What Does Test Size Actually Mean?

Choosing your alpha level means choosing your tolerance for error:

• α = 0.05: Standard choice for general testing — moderate caution.
  
• α = 0.01 or 0.001: Used when false positives are highly risky — like approving a new drug or safety test.
  
• α = 0.10: May be used in early-stage or exploratory research.
  

Common Mistake:

“A 5% test size means a 5% chance of Type II error.”

Incorrect.
That 5% reflects Type I error, not Type II. Type II error depends on other factors like variability, effect size, and sample size.

---

When to Choose a Smaller Alpha?

• When the null hypothesis is too important to reject lightly.
  
• When legal, ethical, or financial risks are high.
  
• When Type I errors are more costly than Type II.
  

In such cases, you may set α = 0.01 or even 0.001, which means you’ll only reject the null if the evidence is extremely strong.

---

It’s All a Trade-Off

• Lower alpha = less chance of Type I error, but more risk of Type II error (unless you increase your sample size).
  
• Higher alpha = more statistical power (lower β), but greater chance of false positives.
  

So the “best” test size depends on the context — not just conventions.

---

Final Thoughts

Understanding and balancing test size with error risks is foundational to good statistical practice. Whether you’re working in finance, healthcare, or policy, your choice of alpha shapes the quality and reliability of your conclusions.

So next time you’re setting up a hypothesis test, don’t just plug in 0.05 by default — ask:

What kind of error is more acceptable in this decision?